Governor’s transportation plan for CT: Where will the money come from?

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy chose the rest area overlooking Interstate 84 in Danbury to hold a press conference on Thursday morning on a transportation plan he described as “first class,” “comprehensive,” and “about the future.”

While some of his remarks centered on the highway behind him, he directed some of his remarks to rail transportation, particularly the Danbury branch line.

Gov. Dannel Malloy will present a comprehensive 30-year transportation plan — five years to “ramp up” and 25 years of construction, he said — to the state legislature on Feb. 18.

Two items he mentioned specifically on Jan. 22 were the extension of the Danbury branch rail line to New Milford, and widening of I-84 to three lanes “in its entirety,” particularly in the Danbury area where the evening rush-hour backups are long and lengthy.

The state Department of Transportation (DOT) is now focused on widening a five-mile section of I-84 between Exits 3 and 8. The I-84 corridor through the western part of the state carries 125,000 vehicles on an average weekday.

Bikeways to airports, too

"The governor’s plan will be all encompassing and include bikeways, trails, buses, rail, airports and highways, but he would not be specific on what was a priority except to say “everything will be a priority.

Both he and DOT Commissioner James Redeker did say the focus on rail would involve improvements for both commuters and moving freight.

“Each of the branch lines has been through extensive studies,” Redeker said. They include Danbury, New Canaan and Waterbury. The Waterbury Branch connects that city and Bridgeport, and includes a station in downtown Derby that also serves Shelton.

The emphasis will be on expanded service and improved service. Although they are secondary to the main passenger line, he said the branch lines offer “extraordinary opportunities” for development and will be a “major focus” of the plan.

Finding the money

Budgeting will have to begin almost immediately to “build the capacity within the Department of Transportation to do the things we have to do,” Malloy said.

As for where the money will come from, he was not specific. “We are not focused on funding now,” but did indicate there may be public partnerships and design-build opportunities.

To a question about paying for the plan with tolls, Malloy said, “There are many ways to pay for transportation improvements,” adding a toll is essentially a tax on motorists.

(Story continues below)


“We are paying for a lack of investment over two generations."

— Gov. Malloy


“We have to make the investment,” he said, or “continue to complain” about the state of transportation in Connecticut. “We are paying for a lack of investment over two generations,” Malloy said.

“I didn’t get elected or re-elected to stand around and do what everyone else has done,” the governor also said.

Long-term funding approach

Among the state officials present at Malloy’s press event was state Rep. Gail Lavielle, a Wilton Republican, who said she agrees with the Democratic governor in that “it has to be looked at as a big plan.

“Infrastructure projects are long term and the funding is also long term,” she said, adding they are ripe for bonding. “When you issue bonds [for infrastructure] the project outlives the life of the bond,” Lavielle said.

“To reduce the conversation to tolls or the [transportation funds] lockbox is a fallacy,” she said.

Many projects cost in the billions

Many legislators have complained of repeated raiding of special transportation funds — collected through gasoline taxes and commuter rail tickets — by this and past administrations, but the funds taken in the past biennium amount to about $120 million, she said. Tolls are projected to raise about $60 to $80 million a year, she added.

“That’s nothing. Just to fix the Metro-North bridges and catenaries and a few other projects would cost about $3.6 billion,” Lavielle said.

When Malloy presents his plan, Lavielle said the questions that need to be asked are:

•    What do we need?

•    How much will it cost?

•    How long will it take?

•    What do we do first?

For her part, Lavielle believes “you have to give serious consideration to where you have the highest usage, and with 39 million riders a year [on the commuter rail lines], that’s pretty high usage to me.”

Need ‘open discussion’ on costs

After Malloy presents his plan, the legislature will decide the budget. If bonding is chosen as the way to go, the legislature authorizes the total amount but the money would be allocated through the state Bond Commission, which is controlled by the governor.

“I agree completely with the governor you have to have an open discussion about how much it will cost,” Lavielle said of the transportation plan, “but we must have an open and honest discussion about the [overall] budget situation.”

Jeannette Ross is editor of The Wilton Bulletin, another Hersam Acorn newspaper and website.